Faizi

Faizi v. Temori

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20245:22-cv-04224California1,004 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AHMAD MUKHTAR FAIZI, an individual Case No. 22-cv-04224-VKD and derivatively on behalf of FALAFEL FLAME, INC.,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

v. SANCTIONS

BAKTASH TEMORI, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 85 Defendants. 13 14 Based on the discussion held at a prior hearing, and although the fact discovery cutoff had already passed, it appeared that there was a possibility for completing some discovery based upon an agreement of the parties. Accordingly, the Court permitted Mr. Faizi to proceed with the depositions of Mr. Temori or Mr. Rustakhis (or both) by October 6, 2023. Dkt. No. 77 at 7. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, Mr. Faizi noticed Mr. Temori’s deposition to occur on September 29, 2023 via Zoom. Dkt. No. 85-1 ¶¶ 4-5. The parties subsequently agreed to continue the deposition to October 2, 2023. Id. ¶ 6. On October 2, 2023,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.