Cornejo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 MARIMAR CORNEJO, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05813-CRB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR

v.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKTS.

& 86) AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ JEFFREY TUMLIN, et al., CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT (DKT. 97)

Defendants.

This lawsuit stems from the towing of pro se Plaintiffs Marimar Cornejo and Jamil Bey’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) 1998 Toyota Camry in February of 2020. See Compl. (dkt. 1). Initially, there were eleven named defendants and eleven constitutional and tort claims in the case. See Compl.; FAC (dkt. 20) ¶¶ 103–86. Now all that remains are four section 1983 claims: (1) a Fourth Amendment claim against Tegsco LLC (d/b/a San Francisco AutoReturn LLC) (“AutoReturn”), Nelsons Tow, and Dan Scanlan (collectively, the “AutoReturn Defendants”), (2) an Eighth Amendment claim against the AutoReturn Defendants, (3) an Eighth Amendment claim against the City and County of San Francisco (“CCSF”) and Jeffery…