Rubalcava

Rubalcava v. City Of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20245:20-cv-04191California698 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 LIONEL RUBALCAVA, Case No. 20-cv-04191-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOLLOWING PRETRIAL

v. CONFERENCE

JOSEPH PEREZ, STEVEN SPILLMAN, and TOPUI FONUA, 11 Defendants. 12 The Final Pretrial Conference was held on April 23, 2024. The Court heard argument on the Motions in Limine filed by Plaintiff and Defendants, which will be addressed in a separate order. The Court also advised counsel regarding trial scheduling and procedures, as summarized below. At the Final Pretrial Conference, the Court discussed with counsel the effect of Defendants’ Notice of Appeal filed April 9, 2024, appealing this Court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. See Not. of Appeal, ECF 279. “[T]he filing of a notice of interlocutory appeal divests the district court of jurisdiction over the particular issues involved in that appeal.” City of Los Angeles, Harbor Div. v. Santa Monica…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.