Sienze

Sienze v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20244:19-cv-04279California782 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 VICTOR M. SIENZE, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04279-JSW

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO REVIEW TAXATION OF

COSTS

COUNTY OF LAKE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 160 Defendants.

14 Following the Court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the Court entered judgment against Plaintiffs on February 8, 2024. (Dkt. No. 150.) On February 14, 2024, Defendants timely filed their bill of costs, which included the required supporting affidavit. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 54-1(a) (providing that no later than 14 days after entry of judgment, a prevailing party claiming taxable costs must file and serve a bill of costs, along with a supporting affidavit attesting that the costs are correctly stated, were necessarily incurred, and are allowable by law). In the bill of costs, Defendants sought $3,798.75. (Dkt. No. 152.) On March 7, 2024, a deficiency notice was sent by the Court clerk and Defendants filed an amended bill of costs. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.