John Muldoon v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20243:15-cv-02723California6,789 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN MULDOON, Case No. 15-cv-02723-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DODGIN'S DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., et al., MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 50

13 Before the court is defendant Dr. David Dodgin, M.D.’s motion to dismiss and strike. Dkt. 50. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND This action was filed by plaintiff John Muldoon on June 17, 2015. Dkt. 1. The operative Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”, Dkt. 42) alleges eighteen (18) causes of action against numerous defendants, all related to damages plaintiff alleges he suffered from his hip-replacement surgery conducted in 2007. The named defendants are Dr. David…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.