Rothschild
Rothschild v. The Pacific Companies
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAYER AMSCHEL ROTHSCHILD, Case No. 23-cv-01721-LJC
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
v. RELATE AND FOR
CONSOLIDATION; DENYING
THE PACIFIC COMPANIES, MOTION FOR RECUSAL Defendant. Re: ECF Nos. 50, 51
12 Pending before the Court is Defendant The Pacific Companies’ Motion to Relate and for Consolidation (ECF No. 50) as well as Plaintiff Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s “Motion for Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros to recuses herself and a Federal Court Judge to replace Judge Cisneros” (hereinafter, Motion for Recusal) (ECF No. 51). Oppositions to both motions were filed. ECF Nos. 52, 53. The Court finds the motions suitable for determination without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Motion to Relate and For Consolidation and DENIES the Motion for Recusal. I. BACKGROUND Mr.…