Banks-Reed

Banks-Reed v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20243:23-cv-04200California260 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 YOLANDA BANKS-REED, et al., Case No. 23-cy-04200-TSH Plaintiffs, y. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. 10 Pending before the Court is Defendant United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss. qe ECF No. 41. Plaintiffs have failed to file an opposition in compliance with Civil Local Rule 7. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the S || orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 || (1962). Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the July 11, 2024 noticed hearing date and || ORDERS Plaintiffs to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute || and failure to comply with court deadlines. Plaintiffs shall file a declaration by May 15, 2024 and simultaneously file either an opposition in compliance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.