Theodorakis
Theodorakis v. DFINITY Stiftung
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EFTYCHIOS THEODORAKIS, Case No. 23-cv-02280-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
v. DISMISS
DFINITY STIFTUNG, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 17, 18, 19 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is DFINITY STIFTUNG’s motion to dismiss, Dominic Williams’s motion to dismiss, and Gian Bochsler’s motion to dismiss. The matters are fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for May 1, 2024 is VACATED. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS the motions to dismiss for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Defendant DFINITY STIFTUNG (“DFINITY” or the “Foundation”) is a Swiss foundation that develops and promotes new technologies and sells a cryptocurrency it created, ICP Tokens. First Amended Complaint (“FAC” or “¶”) (ECF 9) ¶ 1, 13. Defendant…