Flores

Flores v. C.A.R & Associates

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20244:24-cv-00777California1,154 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JORGE FLORES, Case No. 24-cv-00777-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO CONDUCT EARLY

DISCOVERY

C.A.R & ASSOCIATES, Re: Dkt. No. 12 Defendant.

11 On February 9 the Court granted Plaintiff Jorge Flores’s in forma pauperis application and directed the U.S. Marshal to serve Defendant C.A.R. Associates. ECF No. 5. However, when the Marshal attempted service at the address provided by Plaintiff, 135 South State College Blvd., Suite 200, Brea, California 92821, the manager at the building stated that Defendant no longer leased a space there. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff now seeks leave to conduct discovery prior to the Rule 26(f) conference for the purpose of identifying Defendant’s true legal name, if any, the owners, operators, or those otherwise doing business under the name “C.A.R & ASSOCIATES,” and an address for which to serve the summons and complaint upon said owners/operators. ECF No. 12. A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.