Mofrad
Mofrad v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CYRUS MOFRAD, Case No. 23-cv-01899-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. COMPEL ATTENDANCE OF A
WITNESS AT DEPOSITION
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 40 Defendant.
12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Cyrus Mofrad’s Motion to Compel Attendance of Henry Apodaca at Deposition Pursuant to Subpoena. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for May 9, 2024, is VACATED. See Civ. L.R. 7-6. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion, for the following reasons. The Court assumes familiarity with the facts of the case and focuses its attention on the papers filed since February 29, 2024. Approximately three weeks prior to the March 21, 2024 close of fact discovery, Mofrad moved for leave to file an amended complaint and to amend the 22…