Doe
Doe v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, et al., Case No. 23-cv-05218-AMO
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO
THE RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL STRIKE COMPANY, L.L.C., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Marriott International, Inc. and The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC’s motion to dismiss and motion to strike. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without legal argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1-(b). This Order assumes familiarity with the facts of the case, the parties’ arguments, and the relevant law. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion to dismiss and DENIES the motion to strike, for the following reasons. Defendants Marriott International, Inc. (“Marriott”) and The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, …