Rose
Sylabs, Inc. v. Rose
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SYLABS, INC., Case No. 23-cv-00849-SVK
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
v. IN PART AND DENYING IN
PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS
GREGORY ROSE, et al., FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
WITH LIMITED LEAVE TO AMEND
Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 67, 68 12 Plaintiff Sylabs, Inc. (“Sylabs”) accuses 12 Defendants—Gregory Kurtzer (“GK”), Julia 13 Kurtzer (“JK”), Robert Adolph, Matthew Hayden, Erin Fong, CTRL IQ, Inc. d/b/a/ CIQ (“CIQ”), 14 Open Drives, Inc. (“ODI”), David Buss, Marlin Prager, Joel Whitley, IAG Fund II, LP and IAG 15 Capital Holdings II, LLC (together with IAG Fund II, LP, “IAG”)—of conspiring to steal its 16 intellectual property and other valuable non-public information. The Court previously dismissed 17 all of Sylabs’ claims with leave to amend. See Dkt. 59 (the “Prior Order”). Sylabs subsequently 18 filed a first amended complaint. See Dkt. 61 (the “FAC”). Two tranches of Defendants now move 19 to dismiss: IAG and Defendant Whitley on the one hand and remaining…