Cortez

Cortez v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20243:23-cv-01222California727 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHARLES CORTEZ, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01222-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL'S MOTION TO v. WITHDRAW; STAYING ACTION AND

VACATING DEADLINES; VACATING

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., MAY 17, 2024, HEARING; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' Defendants. COUNSEL

12 Before the Court is the Motion, filed April 3, 2024, by John L. Burris, Ben Nisenbaum, and Christopher Dean (collectively, "Law Offices of John L. Burris") "for Leave of Court to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiffs Charles Cortez and Hilma Cortez," which motion, as clarified in a supplemental filing submitted April 11, 2024, seeks an order allowing the Law Offices of John L. Burris to withdraw as counsel not only for Charles Cortez and Hilma Cortez, who are the parents of decedent Michael Cortez, but also for three minors, who are the decedent's children, specifically, (1) J.S., who appears through her guardian ad…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.