Brunskill

Brunskill v. Mitchell

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20243:23-cv-06380California1,496 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DYLAN RICHEY BRUNSKILL, Case No. 23-cv-06380-WHO (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE; v. ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT

TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION

K. MITCHELL, et al., OR NOTICE REGARDING SUCH

MOTION;

Defendants.

INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK

12 13 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Dylan Richey Brunskill alleges that his jailors violated his Eighth Amendment rights by serving him food to which he is allergic. His 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint containing these allegations is now before me for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Brunkskill has stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim against K. Mitchell, the Food Service Manager at the Santa Cruz County Jail. All other defendants and claims are DISMISSED. The Court directs defendant Mitchell to file in response to the complaint a dispositive motion, or a notice regarding such motion, on or before September 3, 2024. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.