Ward

Ward v. American Medical Response Ambulance

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20243:23-cv-05402California635 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANJALI WARD, Case No. 23-cv-05402-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS

COMPLAINT IN ITS ENTIRETY

AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE AMBULANCE, et al., Docket No. 10 Defendants. 12 Presently pending before this Court is the Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Cisneros to dismiss this case in its entirety for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule 41(b). This Court reviews dispositive recommendations de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (“A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.”); U.S. v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 673-74 (1980) (ruling that “certain ‘dispositive’ motions…are covered by § 636(b)(1)(B),” which includes dismissal of an action, and “[a] judge of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.