PYNQ Logistics Services, Inc. v. FedEx Ground Packaging System, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PYNQ LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC., Case No. 23-cv-05881-SK
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL
v. ARBITRATION
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGING SYSTEM, INC., et al., Regarding Docket No. 25 11 Defendants.
13 This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the motion to compel arbitration filed by Defendant FedEx Ground Packaging System, Inc. (“FedEx”). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS that FedEx’s motion to compel and STAYS this action pending arbitration. The Court FURTHER GRANTS that FedEx’s Request for Judicial Notice pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201. BACKGROUND Pursuant to an Independent Service Provider (“ISP”) Agreements between Plaintiff PYNQ Logistics Services, Inc. (“PYNQ”) and FedEx, PYNQ owned and operated FedEx Ground delivery routes that dispatched out of FedEx Stations located in Brookings, Oregon and Arcata, California. (Dkt. No. 20 (First Amended Complaint (“FAC”)),…