Henneberry
Henneberry v. City of Newark
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN PATRICK HENNEBERRY, Case No. 13-cv-05238-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
CITY OF NEWARK, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 465 Defendants.
12 I. INTRODUCTION The Veen Firm, LLP and its attorneys, appointed by this Court to represent Plaintiff John Henneberry, seek to withdraw as counsel of record. ECF No. 465. No opposition has been filed. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the June 6, 2024 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion. II. BACKGROUND On June 13, 2023, the Court appointed The Veen Firm as pro bono counsel for Mr. Henneberry “for all purposes for the duration of the case.” ECF No. 395. By that point, pretrial matters were closed, and the case was tried from April 15 to April 18, 2024. On April 19 the jury delivered a…