eCardless Bancorp, Ltd. v. PayPal Holdings, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ECARDLESS BANCORP, LTD., Case No. 24-cv-01054-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
PAYPAL INC, [Re: ECF No. 129] Defendant.
12 Before the court is Plaintiff eCardless Bancorp, Ltd.’s Amended Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. ECF No. 129. For the reasons described below, the administrative motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City & Cty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). Accordingly, when considering a sealing request, “a ‘strong presumption in favor of access’ is the starting point.” Id. (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,…