Vigil
Vigil v. Hyatt Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOE VIGIL, Case No. 22-cv-00693-HSG
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
v. FINAL APPROVAL AND GRANTING
IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
HYATT CORPORATION, et al., MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 51,
12 Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ unopposed motions for final approval of class action settlement and for attorneys’ fees, costs, and incentive award. Dkt. Nos. 51, 52. The Court held a final fairness hearing on February 22, 2024. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion for final approval. The Court also GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees, costs, and incentive award. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Allegations and Procedural Background Plaintiff Joe Vigil worked as a security officer at the Grand Hyatt San Francisco hotel from approximately February 2001 to November 2020. Dkt. No. 44-2, Ex. C (“SAC”) at ¶¶…