Tashjian

Tashjian v. Invictus Residential Pooler - 2A

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20245:19-cv-01536California1,013 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 VAHE TASHJIAN, Lead Case No. 19-cv-01536-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

RECOVCO MORTGAGE MANAGEMENT, LLC,, et al., Re: ECF No. 258 12 Defendants.

13 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Vahe Tashjian’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Default 14 Judgment (the “Motion”) against Recovco Mortgage Management, LLC (“Recovco”) and Sprout 15 Mortgage Corporation. See Mot., ECF No. 258. No party filed an opposition to the Motion, and 16 the Court heard oral argument on the Motion on May 9, 2024. For the reasons discussed at the 17 hearing and described in brief below, the Court DENIES the Motion without prejudice to Plaintiff 18 refiling it in accordance with the guidance below. 19 First, Sprout Mortgage Corporation is not a proper party to the Motion, because Plaintiff 20 voluntarily dismissed Sprout Mortgage Corporation in 2019. See ECF No. 43. Plaintiff may have 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.