Choudhuri

Choudhuri v. Specialized Loan Servicing

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20244:22-cv-06993California6,899 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

23 On November 7, 2023, Choudhuri filed her second amended complaint (“SAC”) in this 24 action against Defendants Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC., Bosco Credit LLC., Zillow Group, 25 Inc., and Dryden Capital, Inc., whom she claims engaged in a conspiracy to defraud her by 26 illegally foreclosing on her home. ECF No. 72. The Court previously addressed the claims 27 brought against Defendants Zillow and Dryden in a separate order. ECF No. 90. In its prior order regarding Choudhuri’s first amended complaint, the Court found that Choudhuri sufficiently plead claims for violations of Cal. Civ. Code §§ 2923.3 and 2924b against Specialized and Bosco. ECF No. 66. The Court, however, dismissed Choudhuri’s claims against all Defendants for promissory estoppel; tortious interference; unjust enrichment; nuisance; violations of the Holder Rule; 15 U.S.C. § 77q; 31 U.S.C. § 3729; California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”); the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”); the Rosenthal Act; the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) and Regulation Z with prejudice. Id. Choudhuri’s Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.