Valentine

Valentine v. Crocs, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20243:22-cv-07463California7,544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 MARTHA VALENTINE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07463-TLT (PHK) Plaintiffs,

REDACTED ORDER ON

v. DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEFS

NOS. 4-

CROCS, INC., Re: Dkts. 70, 75, 79 Defendant. Discovery Management Conference SET for August 16, 2024 at 1 PM 14 15 This is a putative class action brought by Plaintiffs Martha Valentine, Ruby Cornejo, and 16 Tiffany Avino (collectively “Plaintiffs”) against Defendant Crocs, Inc. concerning “shoes that 17 Defendant sells made of 90% or more Croslite® material.” [Dkt. 33 at ¶¶ 1-2]. The case has been 18 referred to the undersigned for all discovery purposes. See Dkt. 46. 19 Now before the Court are three joint discovery letter briefs regarding ten disputes: (1) 20 Plaintiffs’ requests for production of Crocs’ sales data; (2) Plaintiffs’ request for production of 21 Crocs’ pricing documents; (3) Defendant’s request for production of Plaintiffs’ shoes for 22 inspection; (4)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.