Azucena
Azucena v. Runjyin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CALEB J. AZUCENA, Case No. 23-cv-03234-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART REQUEST FOR
v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO EFFECT
SERVICE ON DEFENDANT RUNJYIN
RUNJYIN, Re: Dkt. No. 13 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff has filed a Bivens action against United States Customs and Border Protection agent Runjyin. On April 22, 2024, the Court informed Plaintiff that the United States Marshal had been unable to effect service on defendant Runjyin. The United States Marshal had been informed by the Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) that there was no employee with Runjyin as either a first or last name. Dkt. No. 12. The Court ordered Plaintiff to, by May 19, 2024, either effect service on defendant Runjyin or submit to the Court sufficient information to identify and locate defendant Runjyin such that the Marshal is able to effect service. Id. The Court informed Plaintiff that failure to comply with this deadline…