Khankin

Khankin v. JLR San Jose, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20243:23-cv-06145California2,599 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DARYA KHANKIN, et al., Case No. 3:23-cv-06145-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. TO DISMISS

JLR SAN JOSE, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 57, 58 Defendants.

12 Darya Khankin and Eliyahu Khankin sue JP Morgan Chase, Inc. (“Chase”) and JLR San Jose, LLC (“JLR”), alleging Defendants engaged in false credit reporting surrounding Plaintiffs’ lease of a Land Rover. JLR and Chase have filed motions to dismiss. (Dkt. Nos. 57. 58.) The deadline for response has passed, and Plaintiffs have failed to respond to either motion. Having carefully considered the briefing, the Court concludes oral argument is not required, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), GRANTS Defendant’s motions, and DISMISSED the complaint without leave to amend. Plaintiffs fail to plead sufficient facts to state a claim, and the Court finds any amendment would be futile. AMENDED COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS The Court’s previous order recounted the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.