Jimenez

Jimenez v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20241:23-cv-06353California5,381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 VICTOR JIMENEZ, et al., Case No. 23-cv-06353-RMI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: PENDING MOTIONS

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 21, 21, 50 U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Now pending before the court is Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (dkt. 68), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (dkt. 20), Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class (dkt. 21), and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (dkt. 50). The matters have been fully briefed (see dkts. 50, 52, 53, 55, 57, 58, 59), and the Parties have presented their positions at oral argument (see dkt. 71). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ motions are denied without prejudice, Defendant’s motion is granted, and the FAC is dismissed with leave to amend. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Victor Jimenez, Venancio Esteban Riego, and Jose Orozco Cuevas, bring this case on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated persons and claim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.