Knapps, Ph.D. v. Education & Training Resources (ETR)

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20243:24-cv-00893California1,279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 UGANDA KNAPPS, Case No. 24-cv-00893-SK

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO

v. SET ASIDE DEFAULT AND MOTION

FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

EDUCATION & TRAINING RESOURCES (ETR), et al., Regarding Docket Nos. 35, 36 Defendants. 12 The matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the motion to set aside default filed by Defendant Minact, Inc. (“Minact”) and the motion for default judgment against Minact filed by Plaintiff Uganda Knapps (“Plaintiff”). The Court finds these motions are suitable for disposition without oral argument and, thus, VACATES the hearings scheduled for June 3, 2024. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). HAVING carefully considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, the Court GRANTS Minact’s motion and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for the reasons set forth below. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c), a court may set aside entry of default 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.