Drake

Drake v. Haier US Appliance Solutions Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20243:23-cv-00939California1,403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHARLES DRAKE, Case No. 23-cv-00939-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS Re: Dkt. No.

INC.,

11 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Charles Drake’s Motion for Reconsideration of Certain Aspects of the Court’s Order on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-6. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby rules as follows. I. BACKGROUND Drake brought this lawsuit on behalf of a putative class of consumers who purchased Defendant’s gas stoves, ovens, and range products. Compl. (ECF 1) ¶ 5. Defendant Haier US Appliance Solutions Inc. (“Haier”) responded by moving to dismiss the complaint. ECF 20. Following briefing of the motion and a hearing, the Court granted in part and denied in part Haier’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.