Kirk

Kirk v. General Insurance Company of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20244:23-cv-05506California2,034 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES KIRK, Case No. 23-cv-05506-HSG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND AND TERMINATING

MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT

GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 13 11 Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff James Kirk’s motion to remand. Dkt. No. 11. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to remand. Accordingly, Defendant Mandy Esrock’s motion to dismiss is TERMINATED AS MOOT. Dkt. No. 13. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff owns real property in San Francisco insured by Defendant General Insurance Company of America (“GICA”). See Dkt. No. 1, Ex. A (“Compl.”) at ¶¶ 15–16. He alleges that in October 2021, the property was flooded with water from a sink on the top floor, causing damage to a large portion of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.