Do

Do v. California Corrections Health Care Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20245:23-cv-05906California435 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MINH CONG DO, Case No. 23-cv-05906 BLF (PR)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONS HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants. (Docket No. 14)

18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against “CDCR Officers,” “CDCR Nurses,” “CDCR Doctors,” and the 20 “California Corrections Health Care Services.” Dkt. No. 8. On April 2, 2024, the Court 21 dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 12. Plaintiff was directed to file a 22 response within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed, which was April 30, 23 2024. Id. at 5. 24 The Court notes that on April 16, 2024, the mail sent to Plaintiff was returned as 25 undeliverable. Dkt. No. 13. The Clerk resent a copy of the court order on April 17, 2024. 26 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.