Alexander

Alexander v. Hilton Hotels Worldwide

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20243:24-cv-00830California262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 LIAM ALEXANDER, Case No. 24-cv-00830-TSH Plaintiff, y. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HILTON HOTELS WORLDWIDE, et al., Defendants. 10 Pending before the Court is Defendant Justice Operating Company’s motion to dismiss. qe ECF No. 17. Plaintiff Liam Alexander failed to file an opposition in compliance with Civil Local || Rule 7. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the 14 || orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 || (1962). Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the June 6, 2024 noticed hearing date and || ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court deadlines. Plaintiff shall file a declaration by June 6, 2024 and simultaneously file either an opposition in compliance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or a statement …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.