Hunt

Hunt v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20245:23-cv-04953California2,100 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUSTIN HUNT, Case No. 23-cv-04953-PCP

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION

META PLATFORMS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 93, 102 Defendants.

12 In this putative consumer class action, plaintiff Justin Hunt alleges that his sensitive tax return information was improperly transmitted to Google and Meta when he used H&R Block’s online service to file his taxes. He brings this action against HRB Tax Group, Inc. and HRB Digital LLC (collectively “H&R Block”), as well as Meta Platforms, Inc. and Google, LLC. The Court previously concluded that Mr. Hunt’s claims against H&R Block were covered by the arbitration provision in the H&R Block Online Services Agreement to which Mr. Hunt assented, and on that basis granted H&R Block’s motion to compel arbitration of those claims. See Order, Dkt. No. 122, ––– F.Supp.3d ––––, 2024 WL 1561469 (N.D. Cal. 2024). Mr. Hunt has not entered into an arbitration agreement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.