Flores

Flores v. Borla

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20243:24-cv-02238California1,152 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PABLO G. FLORES, Case No. 24-cv-02238-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE

v. AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

EDWARD J. BORLA, et al., Defendants.

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a California prisoner, filed this pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the following officials at the California Training Facility (“CTF”): Warden Edward J. Borla and Correctional Officers K. Garzon, A.S. Mendes, G. Oropeza, A. Martinez, M. Sanchez, E. Santillan, and A. Avila. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted in a separate order. For the reasons explained below, Plaintiff has not stated a cognizable claim for relief, and he is granted leave to file an amended complaint. STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.