Jaddou

Impossible Foods Inc. v. Jaddou

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20244:23-cv-02720California2,714 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IMPOSSIBLE FOODS INC., Case No. 23-cv-02720-DMR

Plaintiff, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION v. TO ALTER OR AMEND

UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Re: Dkt. No. 28 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Impossible Foods, Inc. filed this action to challenge the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (“USCIS”) denial of its I-140 petition to classify an employee as an “outstanding professor or researcher” for purposes of an immigrant visa petition. On January 22, 2024, the court granted Defendant Ur M. Jaddou’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first claim for relief with prejudice. [Docket No. 28 (Jan. 22, 2024 Order).] Plaintiff now moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to alter or amend the January 22, 2024 Order, or in the alternative, to amend the complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2). [Docket No. 28.] The motion is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.