Arrellano

Arrellano v. Sonoma County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20244:23-cv-00187California6,249 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FRANCISCO ARRELLANO, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00187-DMR

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON SECOND MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

SONOMA COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 53 Defendants.

Plaintiffs Francisco Arrellano and his minor son S.A., by and through his guardian ad litem Arrellano, filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants Sonoma County and Deena Mistry. [Docket No. 52 (FAC).] Defendants now move to dismiss all claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [Docket No. 53 (Mot.).] The court held a hearing on April 11, 2024. For the following reasons, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND This action was removed from Sonoma County Superior Court on January 13, 2023. [Docket No. 1.] Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on February 21, 2023. [Docket No. 11.] The court granted the motion with leave to amend on July 13, 2023. [Docket No. 34.] At the July 13, 2023 motion hearing, the court ordered that in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.