Hoffman

Hoffman v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20245:24-cv-00983California2,450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

1 Hoffman alleges that her vote in the 2020 Election was never counted by the San Benito 2 County Election Office. See Compl. Hoffman’s allegation arises from two circumstances: (1) her 3 double voter registration, and (2) the use of different tenses in emails confirming the receipt of her 4 ballots. Id. 5 First, Hoffman alleges that her 2020 Election ballot was not counted because she was 6 erroneously registered in two counties: Santa Clara and San Benito. Id. at 2. Hoffman was a 7 registered voter in Santa Clara until she moved to San Benito in 2016. Id. Hoffman re-registered 8 in San Benito after her move, but she continued to receive two mail-in ballots from both counties, 9 one containing an incorrect spelling of her name. Id. 10 Second, Hoffman alleges that her ballot was not counted because the confirmation email 11 for her 2020 Election ballot used a future tense. Id. at 3. Plaintiff voted in-person during the 2020 12 Election, after which time she received an email from BallotTrax, a statewide system that allows 13 voters to track and receive email notifications on the status of their ballot. Id. at 2–3. The email 14 Hoffman received…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.