Friedman

Friedman v. Jenkins

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20244:23-cv-05036California4,541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JACK ARNE FRIEDMAN, Case No. 23-cv-05036-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v. BROOKE JENKINS' MOTION TO

DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

BROOKE JENKINS, et al., COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 27

12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Brooke Jenkins (“Jenkins”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers and relevant legal authority, and it finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The hearing set for May 31, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. is HEREBY VACATED. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss, with leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jack Arne Friedman (“Plaintiff”) was previously employed as an Investigator in the Independent Investigations Bureau within the Office of the San Francisco District Attorney. (First Am. Compl.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.