Doe
Doe v. Becerra
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 JOHN DOE, Case No. 23-cv-05327-RMI
Petitioner,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO ENFORCE
v. Re: Dkt. No. 20 MOISES BECERRA, et al., Respondents.
13 Now pending before court is Petitioner’s Motion to Enforce the Judgment (dkt. 20). Respondents have filed an Opposition (dkt. 26), and Petitioner has filed a Reply (dkt. 27). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. For the reasons stated below, Petitioner’s motion is denied. Petitioner is a person detained in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) pending the outcome of his removal proceedings. See Pet. (dkt. 1) at 2. He instituted this litigation because “[s]ince his detention by ICE began in March 2020, no neutral adjudicator has ever conducted a hearing to determine whether his lengthy detention is warranted based…