Bonazza
Bonazza v. MUFG Bank, Ltd.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL ALAN BONAZZA,
Case No. 23-cv-01161-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS
MUFG BANK, LTD.,
Re: Dkt. Nos. 109, 111 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff has filed three summary judgment motions in this case. See docket nos. 108, 109 and 111. The Court has already denied one of these motions (docket no. 108) as moot because it is identical to a subsequent motion (docket no. 109). The Court now denies the two remaining summary judgment motions (“Motions”). In docket no. 109, Plaintiff has filed a one-page motion stating as follows: Plaintiff is asking the court for summary judgment in Plaintiff[’]s favor in the amount of 6,918,000 dollars, which represents 2.9 Million dollars in lost wages based on the plaintiff[’]s 2022 contract, 2.5 Million dollars in incremental FP + A for discretionary performance, 1.2 Million dollars for distress…