Randle

Randle v. Bell

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20243:23-cv-05801California1,001 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAMELLO RANDLE, Case No. 23-cv-05801-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL; DENYING

v. MOTION FOR SUBPOENA

KEVIN BELL, et al., Defendants. (ECF No. 3)

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, an inmate in the Contra Costa County Jail who is proceeding without representation by an attorney, filed this civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office and three Deputy District Attorneys involved in his prosecution on murder charges in Contra Costa County Superior Court. (ECF No. 1.) For the reasons explained below, the complaint is dismissed because it does not state a claim that is capable of judicial review and determination. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges in September and October 2022, prior to the beginning of his criminal trial, he filed two motions under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). (ECF No. 1 at 12.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.