McKinney-Drobnis

McKinney-Drobnis v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 31, 20243:16-cv-06450California2,174 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BAERBEL MCKINNEY-DROBNIS, et Case No. 16-cv-06450-MMC al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR POST-JUDGMENT v. AWARD OF FEES

MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING, LLC,

11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is plaintiffs Baerbel McKinney-Dropnis, Joseph B. Piccola, and 13 Camille Berlese's Motion, filed February 8, 2024, "for Post-Judgment Award of Attorney 14 Fees on Class Action Settlement." Defendant Massage Envy Franchising, LLC has filed 15 opposition, to which plaintiffs have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed 16 in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 17 By order filed May 24, 2022 ("May 24 Order"), the Court approved, pursuant to 18 Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties' Stipulation of Class Action 19 Settlement and Release, as amended by the Amendment and Modification to Stipulated 20 Class Action Settlement and Release (collectively, "Settlement Agreement"). Under the 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.