Estavillo

Estavillo v. Cortese

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20245:23-cv-04032California2,889 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ERIK ESTAVILLO, Case No. 23-cv-04032-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS

DAVE CORTESE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 37 Defendants.

13 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Erik Estavillo filed this action alleging that defendants violated Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) when they refused his request for a third parking permit, beyond the two permits customarily allowed for residents at the Country Club Villa Apartments (“Apartments”). See Dkt. No. 1; see also Dkt. No. 21 at 3. After the Court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss based on the claim-splitting doctrine, defendants answered the complaint. Dkt. Nos. 21, 23. When the deadlines for compliance with this District’s General Order 56 lapsed, see Dkt. No. 2, the Court directed the parties to file a status report. Dkt. No. 27. In his status reports, Mr. Estavillo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.