Jaiyeola

Jaiyeola v. AT&T

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20245:23-cv-05182California596 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, Case No. 5:23-cv-05182-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISQUALIFY

v. 10 T-MOBILE US, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 105 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion to disqualify the Undersigned. Mot. to Disqualify, ECF No. 105; see also ECF Nos. 52, 57, 99. Plaintiff argues that a sentence in the Court’s April 2, 2024, order dismissing his case reveals a personal bias toward Plaintiff. See Order Granting Mots. to Dismiss and Den. Mot. for Leave to Am. (“Order of Dismissal”), ECF No. 101. Defendants did not file an opposition. Having carefully reviewed the relevant documents, the Court finds this motion suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. Motions to disqualify, or recuse, a judge fall under two statutory provisions, 28 U.S.C. § 144 and 28 U.S.C. § 455,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.