Lin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HSIN LIN, Case No. 21-cv-05062-PJH Plaintiff,

v. DISCOVERY ORDER

SOLTA MEDICAL, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 106 Defendant.

13 Before the court is the parties’ fifth joint discovery dispute letter. Dkt. 106. Having read the parties’ submissions and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. The parties present two issues. First, they dispute the appropriate length and scope of plaintiff’s second deposition. Second, they dispute whether defendant must produce images that were part of otherwise-produced complaint files. A. Second Deposition of Plaintiff Solta Medical, Inc. (“Solta”) seeks four additional hours to depose plaintiff. Plaintiff has already sat for a 7.5-hour deposition. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(d)(1) limits a deposition to 1 day of 7 hours absent agreement between the parties or a court order. “The…