Kimner

Kimner v. Davila

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20244:24-cv-02750California1,619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AUDREY L. KIMNER, Case No. 24-cv-02750-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS

EDWARD J. DAVILA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 3 Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Audrey L. Kimner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See Dkt. No. 3. I. INTRODUCTION The Court may authorize the commencement of a civil action in forma pauperis if it is satisfied that the would-be litigant cannot pay the filing fees necessary to pursue the action and that the action states a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), (e)(2); Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). If the Court determines that the action “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” it must dismiss the case. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Having reviewed Plaintiff’s application, the Court finds that she is unable to pay the full…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.