Riordan

Riordan v. Western Digital Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20245:21-cv-06074California4,317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KEVIN RIORDAN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-06074-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS 1, 3, &

v. 4 OF PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION, Defendant. Re: ECF No.

13 Plaintiffs Kevin Riordan, Ashley Laurent, Jeremy Bobo, and Nagui Sorial (together, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Defendant Western Digital Corporation (“Defendant” or “Western Digital”), a manufacturer of data storage devices, alleging that Defendant failed to properly secure and safeguard information Plaintiffs stored on Defendant’s devices. The operative Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) asserts claims for (1) violation of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (the “Song-Beverly Act” or the “Act”), California Civil Code §§ 1792, et seq.; (2) negligence / failure to warn; (3) violation of the California Unfair …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.