Hunt

Hunt v. Sunrise Operations LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20243:23-cv-06441California1,210 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANDREW HUNT, Case No. 23-cv-06441-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILE SAC

SUNRISE OPERATIONS LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendants.

12 Now before the Court is plaintiff Andrew Hunt’s motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Dkt. No. 31. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for June 14, 2024. The Court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion for leave to file the SAC. Plaintiff shall file the SAC on the docket no later than June 11, 2024. 18 BACKGROUND On December 14, 2023, plaintiff filed this suit against defendant Sunrise Operations, LLC. Dkt. No. 1. On January 2, 2024, plaintiff filed an amended complaint, adding The Pasha Group (“TPG”) as a defendant. Dkt. No. 10. Plaintiff alleges that he was terminated from his position as Chief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.