Jaiyeola

Jaiyeola v. Apple, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20245:23-cv-03462California855 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, Case No. 5:23-cv-03462-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISQUALIFY

v.

APPLE, INC, Re: Dkt. No. 65 Defendant.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to disqualify the Undersigned. Mot. to Disqualify, ECF No. 65. Plaintiff argues that a statement in the Court’s March 27, 2024, order dismissing his case reveals a personal bias toward Plaintiff. See Order Granting Mot. to Dismiss and Den. Mot. for Leave to Am. (“Order of Dismissal”), ECF No. 60. Defendant filed an opposition, and Plaintiff filed a reply. Opp’n, ECF No. 70; Reply, ECF No. 71. Having carefully reviewed the relevant documents, the Court finds this motion suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. Motions to disqualify, or recuse, a judge fall under two statutory provisions, 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.