Nettles

Nettles v. Falck Northern California Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20243:24-cv-01640California2,843 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SIMONE NETTLES,

Case No. 24-cv-01640-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND

FALCK NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

CORP., Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION In this putative wage and hour class action, Plaintiff Simone Nettles asserts Defendant Falck Northern California Corporation (“Falck”), a provider of emergency medical services to Alameda County, violated various provisions of California state law. Nettles originally filed this case in Alameda County Superior Court. Falck removed to federal court on March 15, 2024, asserting federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 on the grounds that several of Nettles’ state law claims are preempted by the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”) because they depend on the interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”). Nettles now moves to remand, arguing Falck’s removal was procedurally improper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.