Hirlinger

Hirlinger v. WP Company LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20243:23-cv-05963California4,373 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH HIRLINGER, et al., Case No. 23-cv-05963-AMO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

WP COMPANY LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 12 Defendant.

12 This case concerns allegations of false advertising. Before the Court is Defendant WP Company LLC’s motion to transfer venue or, in the alternative, to dismiss the Complaint. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the hearing set for June 27, 2024. See Civil L.R. 7-6. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion to dismiss and does not reach the motion to transfer for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND1 Plaintiffs Joseph Hirlinger and Guy Ball are residents of California. Compl. ¶¶ 18-19. Defendant WP Company LLC (“TWP”) is a Delaware corporation with its headquarters in Washington, D.C. Compl. ¶…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.