Angry Chickz, Inc. v. Bosphorus Trade, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20243:23-cv-03569California7,468 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ANGRY CHICKZ, INC., Case No. 23-cv-03569-VKD

Plaintiff, INTERIM ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

BOSPHORUS TRADE, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 20 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Angry Chickz, Inc. (“Angry Chickz”) moves for entry of default judgment against defendants Bosphorus Trade, Inc. (“Bosphorus”) and Salih Inci. Dkt. No. 20. Neither defendant has appeared and the Clerk has entered default against them. Dkt. No. 18. The Court previously found this matter suitable for determination without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b); Dkt. Nos. 24, 27. Having reviewed Angry Chickz’s complaint, motion for default judgment, and supporting documents, it appears that Angry Chickz is entitled to judgment in its favor on liability. However, Angry Chickz seeks injunctive relief that does not comply with Rules 65(d) and 54(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.